Dennis Baker, University of Guelph

 

Professor Baker is a graduate of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law and holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Calgary. His research focuses on the separation of powers, particularly the relationship between the courts and the representative branches. His book, Not Quite Supreme, considers the limits of the Supreme Court of Canada’s power to settle political controversies and offers a spirited defense of a Parliament’s role in constitutional interpretation. Professor Baker has written on a number of constitutional controversies including the use of retroactive remedies in same-sex equality cases and has co-authored articles on the institutional politics behind the rules of evidence in sexual assault cases and the strategic maneuvering behind the Supreme Court rulings on prisoners’ voting rights.

Professor Baker is currently investigating the nature of executive power in Canadian constitutionalism.  He is also conducting a study on the impact of federalism on Canadian criminal justice policy.  Professor Baker is interested in a wide variety of issues related to law & politics, including Anglo-American constitutional theory, Canadian legal history, federalism and deliberative democracy. 

Stéphanie Chouinard, Royal Military College of Canada

 

Stéphanie Chouinard is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Royal Military College of Canada (Kingston). She earned her Ph.D. in Political Science at the University of Ottawa, for which she was awarded a Vanier Scholarship and a fellowship from the Baxter & Alma Ricard foundation. She has been a postdoctoral fellow of the Faculty of Law at the Université de Montréal and a visiting scholar at the University of Edinburgh. Her research interests focus on the relationship between courts and minorities in democratic systems, and particularly the Supreme Court of Canada's impact on the evolution of official-language rights and Aboriginal self-determination rights. She is also interested in territorial and non-territorial autonomy arrangements for linguistic minorities in the world. 

Dr. Chouinard has published in Ethnopolitics, the Language Rights ReviewLanguage Minorities and Society, and the International Journal of Canadian Studies, among others.


Greg Flynn, McMaster University


Greg Flynn is a teaching stream, assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario.  He has a law degree from the University of Western Ontario, was called to the Bar in 1998 and practised law for five years before returning to academia and continues to be a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada.  He earned an MA in Canadian politics and a PhD in comparative public policy from McMaster and has been teaching in the department of Political Science since 2006.

 Dr. Flynn's teaching and research interests focus on the intersection of law, public policy and public administration as well as the role of law and courts in democratic politics.  His work has been published in journals such as Parliamentary Affairs, Journal of Parliamentary and Public Law, Canadian Public Policy, Canadian Public Administration, and Canadian Political Science Review as well as a number of book chapters.  His current work involves consideration of judicial review/activism and administrative and legislative decision making processes and outcomes as well as the impact of courts on elections in Canada.     

Ian Greene, York University

 

Ian Greene has taught public policy and administration at York University since 1985.  He earned a B.A. from the University of Alberta, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Toronto.  He worked in Alberta's public service for four years in the 1970s and 1980s both as a middle manager, and Ministerial Assistant.

Greene is a University Professor Emeritus in the School of Public Policy and Administration, and Master Emeritus of McLaughlin College.  He was the founding Director of York’s Masters program in Public Policy, Administration and Law.  He is a past Chair of the University Senate, and a former Associate Dean in the Faculty of Arts. 

Greene’s most recent book is The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (2014).  He is also author The Courts (2006), which is part of the Canadian Democratic Audit series.  He was the principal author of Final Appeal, (1998), which analyses decision-making in Canadian appeal courts, and is based on interviews with 101 of Canada’s appellate court judges, including Supreme Court of Canada judges.  His co-authored book with David Shugarman, Honest Politics, (1997) studies the ethics regimes for Canadian cabinet ministers.   His other books are The Charter of Rights (1989), and Judges and Judging (1990, with Peter McCormick). As well, he was a member of the research team, led by Prof. Maureen Mancuso at the University of Guelph, which published A Question of Ethics in 1998 (second edition, 2006).  He has authored more than 40 academic journal articles or book chapters.  He is a frequent media commentator regarding issues concerning public sector ethics, and judicial decisions. 

Matthew Hennigar, Brock University

 

Matthew Hennigar is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Brock University. His research and teaching focus on the legal and institutional dimensions of Canadian and Comparative politics, in particular the judiciary's organization and impact on public policy, rights litigation, constitutional politics, and the Canadian government's legal bureaucracy.

His recent and on-going research projects focus on judicial appointment in Canada, the structure of the Attorney General's office, and government litigation under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He is a co-author of Canadian Courts: Law, Politics, and Process (with Lori Hausegger and Troy Riddell) and his work has appeared in the Canadian Journal of Political Science, Law and Society Review, the International Journal of Constitutional Law, Canadian Public Administration, Comparative Politics, and the Osgoode Hall Law Journal.

Janet Hiebert, Queen's University

 

Janet Hiebert is a Professor in the Department of Political Studies at Queen's University. Her most recent book, with James Kelly, is Parliamentary Bills of Rights. The Experiences of New Zealand and the United Kingdom (Cambridge University Press, 2015). She is the author of two books about the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Charter Conflicts: What is Parliament’s Role?  (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002), and Limiting Rights: The Dilemma of Judicial Review (McGill-Queen's University Press, 1996), along with numerous papers and chapters on the politics of rights and on campaign finance laws in Canada.

She has served as a member of the Ontario Electoral Boundaries Commission, an independent, non-partisan body with responsibility to readjust the electoral boundaries in the province of Ontario. Her current research project examines the use of bills of rights and other statutory instruments to alter the norms of legislative decision-making, with a particular focus on Canada and Australia.

Ran Hirschl, University of Toronto

Ran Hirschl (PhD, Yale) is Professor of Political Science and Law, and holds a Canada Research Chair in Constitutionalism, Democracy and Development at the University of Toronto. He is the author of Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2004 & 2007), Constitutional Theocracy (Harvard University Press, 2010)—winner of the 2011 Mahoney Prize in Legal Theory, and Comparative Matters (Oxford University Press, 2014)—winner of the 2015 APSA C. Herman Pritchett award for the best book on law and courts, as well as over 80 articles and book chapters on Canadian and comparative constitutionalism and judicial review, constitutional design, the judicialization of politics, law and religion, and the intellectual history of public law, published in journals such as Comparative Politics, Law & Social Inquiry, Political Theory, Journal of Political Philosophy, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, Constellations, Human Rights Quarterly, Revue Française de Science Politique, Annual Review of Political Science, and the American Journal of Comparative Law. In 2012, Hirschl was awarded a Killam Research Fellowship by the Canada Council for the Arts. In 2014, he was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada.

Andrea Lawlor, King's University College at Western University

Andrea Lawlor is an Assistant Professor at King’s University College at Western University. She earned her M.A. from the University of British Columbia and her PhD from McGill University. Her research focuses the role of media in the policy process across a wide range of policy areas including immigration, social and environmental policy. Her research on media and public policy can be found in the Canadian Journal of Political Science, the Journal of Social Policy, the Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, among others. She has also published work on Canadian and comparative political institutions, including the Senate, the Supreme Court and Cabinet in Comparative and Commonwealth Politics, Canadian Parliamentary Review and Canadian Public Administration. Dr. Lawlor currently holds a SSHRC Insight Development grant for her collaborative project, “Third Party Campaign Spending: Weak Policy, Weakened Engagement?” with Dr. Erin Crandall (Acadia University). 

Emmett Macfarlane, University of Waterloo

 

Emmett Macfarlane's main research interests focus on the intersection of governance, constitutional law,and public policy, with a particular focus on the Supreme Court of Canada. His first book, Governing from the Bench: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Judicial Role, was published in 2013 by UBC Press and examines the internal workings and judicial behaviour at the Court. He is also the editor of Constitutional Amendment in Canada, published by the University of Toronto Press in 2016.

Other projects include an examination of inter-institutional relationships under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, specifically analyzing legislative responses to judicial decisions; investigating the role of positive rights; analyzing constitutional amendment in Canada; and examining reproductive rights and policy issues. He currently holds a SSHRC grant to investigate the role and policy impact of officers of Parliament.

Dr. Macfarlane has published in the International Political Science ReviewCanadian Journal of Political Science, Canadian Public Administration, Supreme Court Law Review, McGill Law Review, Review of Constitutional Studies, and the Journal of Canadian Studies, among others. 

Kate Puddister, University of Guelph

 

Kate Puddister is an assistant professor at the University of Guelph. Kate’s work assesses the interaction between political actors and the judiciary, and the judicialization of politics. More specifically, her work looks at the litigation behaviour of governments and instances where political actors rely on courts to make political and normative decisions.

Professor Puddister's work focuses on how judicial review can benefit elected officials, why political actors empower courts, and how litigation can be a viable political strategy. This focus considers the implications of this relationship between elected officials and courts on judicial independence and the separation of powers in Canada. Her most recent project undertakes a comprehensive analysis of the Canadian reference cases and addresses why governments delegate decision-making power to the courts in reference case episodes.

Emmanuelle Richez, University of Windsor

 

Dr. Emmanuelle Richez’s research examines law and politics in Canada and other advanced liberal democracies, with a particular focus on ethno-cultural minority rights. Her doctoral dissertation measured the impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on cultural rights and policies, notably in the areas of Multiculturalism, language, and Aboriginal affairs. It received the Joseph and Sandra Rotman Prize for having made a distinctive contribution to the understanding and 
conduct of public policy in Canada.

Dr. Richez is currently involved in several research initiatives on courts and politics. She is conducting a comparative analysis of the effects of bills of rights on Aboriginal Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Her other research projects pertain to the Supreme Court of Canada’s role in promoting access to justice and to Canada's compliance with international law.

Troy Riddell, University of Guelph

 

Troy Riddell has teaching and research interests in law and politics, constitutional rights and criminal justice policy.  He is a co-author of Canadian Courts: Law, Politics and Process (with Lori Hausegger and Matthew Hennigar) and his work has appeared in such venues as Canadian Journal of Political Science, Law and Society Review, Osgoode Hall Law Journal and the Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice Policy.  

His current research projects involve analyzing judicial decision-making in Canadian courts of appeal and assessing and trying to explain the policy and behavioural responses of the police to Charter of Rights decisions.

Peter H. Russell, University of Toronto

 

Principal of Senior College and professor emeritus of political science at the University of Toronto where he has taught since 1958. He was a Canadian pioneer in the political science of the judiciary.  Among his Canadian publications, are The Supreme Court of Canada as a Bilingual and Bicultural InstitutionThe Judiciary in Canada: The Third Branch of Government and an edited volume, Canada’s Trial Courts. He has been an active member of IPSA’s Research Committee on Comparative Judicial Studies, and has co-edited volumes on Judicial Independence and the Appointment of Judges.

Robert Schertzer, University of Toronto

Robert Schertzer is an Assistant Professor at the University of Toronto. He publishes and teaches on the intersection of three areas: federalism; constitutional and judicial politics; and, the management of diversity. His work tends to focus on Canada, from a broadly comparative perspective.  

He is currently working on two related research agendas. The first examines the role of high courts in diverse federations. The principal output in this area is a forthcoming monograph, The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation: Lessons from the Supreme Court of Canada, which will be published with the University of Toronto Press in May 2016. The second agenda examines the representation of ethno-national minorities in central political institutions, including high courts.

Robert completed his PhD at the London School of Economics (in 2012). He also has a decade of experience in the federal public service working in the areas of intergovernmental relations, immigration and social policy.

Byron Sheldrick, University of Guelph


 

David E. Smith, Ryerson University

 

David E. Smith, OC, FRSC, is currently Distinguished Visiting Professor at Ryerson University and Professor Emeritus, Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Regina. He taught in the Department of Political Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, from 1964 until 2004, and is a previous President of the Canadian Political Science Association. 

His publications include a trilogy of works on each of the parts of Parliament, as well as books on political parties, the constitution, and federalism. The People's House of Commons: Theories of Democracy in Contention (University of Toronto Press) won the Donner Prize for the best book in Canadian public policy in 2007. His most recent book, Across the Aisle: Opposition in Canadian Politics (2013),  won the Canada Prize in Social Sciences in 2014. 

Dave Snow, University of Guelph

 

Dave Snow is an Assistant Professor in the department of political science and the Criminal Justice and Public Policy (CJPP) program at the University of Guelph. He researches the intersection of law, medicine, and politics, particularly with respect to assisted reproduction and the governance of fertility clinics. 

His current research project explores how various actors – including governments, medical colleges, and courts – influence this policy field in Canada, Australia, and the United States. He is also exploring how medical and scientific self-regulation occurs in the absence of robust government policy for embryonic research in Canada.

Broadly speaking, his research concerns Canadian constitutional and criminal law, especially the Supreme Court of Canada, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and federalism.

Dagmar Soennecken, York University

 

Dagmar Soennecken (PhD, Toronto) is an Associate Professor in the School of Public Policy and Administration at York University. She is cross-appointed to the Department of Social Science (Law & Society Program). Dagmar regularly teaches courses on social movements and legal mobilization, Canadian constitutional law and politics and law, citizenship & migration.

Her research focuses on comparative politics and public policy in the EU and North America. Dagmar is particularly interested in questions concerning law and the courts as they relate to citizenship and migration. Past work has focused specifically on asylum policies in Germany and Canada. 

Her work has appeared in Comparative Migration Studies, Droit et Société, Studies in Law, Politics and Society, the Review of European and Russian Affairs and Law & Policy (forthcoming).